Tours & activities centralisation has failed – time to decentralise

September 27th, 2021

Alex Bainbridge

Roughly 10% of sightseeing & experiences bookings are via centralised online travel agents. Reservation systems are all built around centralisation, feeding data to & receiving transactions from centralised platforms.

However centralisation has failed and has now run out of time. Incumbents and most challengers are based on web 2 but web 3 is around the corner…….

What is web 3?

  1. Web 1 was read only
  2. Web 2 is read/write – ecommerce, publishing, social media etc
  3. Web 3 is decentralisation

To better explain the differences between 1, 2 & 3….

In sightseeing & experiences, the primary centralised services that accrued the value were online travel agents (OTAs).

Web 3 is what makes prior travel industry centralisation obsolete

What can you decentralise?

  • Customer profile – read this article by Doug Rice (about hotels), or read the use cases in the DIF Hospitality & Travel SIG
  • Transaction – the customer > supplier booking itself
  • Secondary booking markets – e.g. a travel agent pre-purchasing 100 tickets from an attraction and then selling them to their own customers, issuing the attractions own ticket references
  • The customer money – e.g. Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies
  • The ownership of an itinerary – in particular for digital experience platforms
  • The review process – e.g. verifying that a customer really did consume what they are reviewing (Read the verified stay use case from the DIF SIG)
  • The supply contract – including a suppliers offer to accept travel agent bookings from accredited travel agents
  • Proof of being a travel agent – so you can book as a travel agent
  • The supply payout / settlement – in particular multilayer transactions – e.g. see Travel Ledger
  • Customer loyalty validation – especially useful for multi-member, multi-franchise global tour operators who otherwise struggle to share customer information between members for data protection reasons
  • Proof of consumer visit (to a destination) – e.g. see Lost Worlds
  • Proof of consumer certification (e.g. diving / sailing) – is this person sufficiently qualified to book this product? Is this person really OK for an all day volcano climb?
  • Proof of tour guide experience – yes that private tour guide you want to hire really has delivered this experience 100 times as they say
  • Social media – e.g. see Scuttlebutt

I am sure this list is not exhaustive. (e.g. climate change not on the list above but should be)

With web 3 gaining more and more adoption over the previous few months, we can now safely say we are at the tail end of web 2. Web 2 has years to run, but all new tech that has any aspiration to make a dent has to be web 3, or partially web 3 during this transitional period. Or hardware where this is (mainly) moot.

An alternative way to ask the question is “Can sightseeing & experiences sector keep going on a centralisation strategy when the web as a whole is adopting a decentralisation strategy?

The hotel sector, now at perhaps 70% bookings via centralised online travel agents (OTAs), is fully focussed on decentralising. They are motivated as they are over centralised – hotel brands want to regain control of their own product, provide better customer experiences and protect themselves from massive databreach fines.

Sightseeing & experiences never achieved that state of high centralisation, so now never will. We can go straight to decentralisation, in the same way that some less developed countries went straight from no telephones to high adoption of mobile phones, with no land line intermediate stage.

Aren’t we forgetting something?

This article is about web 3. The other seismic change that is happening concurrently is the 4th industrial revolution:

  • First industrial revolution – gave us steam – this enabled Thomas Cook and his early train based day trips
  • Second industrial revolution – gave us electricity, gas & oil – this enabled early vehicle based sightseeing. e.g. market leader Gray Line is over 100 years old and was one of the sector winners of the second industrial revolution
  • Third industrial revolution – gave us computers – this enabled ecommerce & distribution to online travel agencies etc – e.g. market leader Viator was one of the sector winners of the third industrial revolution
  • Forth industrial revolution – giving us AI powered software & robotics – this enables humanoid robots to speak & interact, and also enables autonomous vehicles

Good luck to everyone analysing whether the 4th industrial revolution is more impactful to your business than web 3!

For the record, I am still working on 4th industrial revolution technologies, however if I was an OTA or a reservation system, I would be working on web 3 as my priority. One thing for sure, pretty much everything you think you know about how technology is used in our sector is about to change.

For those who are entrepreneurial, there are opportunities galore.

 

Image: Unsplash

This content is protected by copyright. Link sharing is encouraged but duplication and redistribution is illegal

Comments

One response to “Tours & activities centralisation has failed – time to decentralise”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *